Join the BitcoinNews Telegram channel for daily updates >>LINK

IEOs, ICOs, Whatever the Name, Regulation is the Issue

IEOs, ICOs, Whatever the Name, Regulation is the Issue (1)

Support free writers: > send a tip

written by

With Initial Exchange Offerings (IEOs) gaining in popularity, industry experts have been suggesting that their uncertain regulatory status doesn’t necessarily mark an improvement as a way of generating new capital.

An IEO is conducted via a cryptocurrency exchange. Unlike Initial Coin Offerings (ICOs), an IEO is administered by a crypto exchange on behalf of the startup that seeks to raise funds with its newly issued tokens. ICOs raised nearly USD 30 billion over a period of three years until hitting a wall in 2018/2019 as the SEC cracked down on fraudulent activity and illegal offerings blighting the market.

Many analysts see IEOs as a way of sidestepping strict market regulation, but Peter Van Valkenburgh, director of research at advocacy group Coin Center in Washington, begs to disagree that there is any mileage in this argument. He suggests:

“I don’t expect IEOs to result in better outcomes… From a regulatory and legal standpoint, there’s not going to be much difference here… Calling it now an IEO is not going to change your obligation to the potential issuer of that token if the token fits the test for a security, which I think in many cases it will.”

Crypto advisory firm TokenMarket’s CEO Ransu Salovaara claims that whatever the method of raising capital, tokens still need to work as utility tokens in the long run. Cryptocurrency research firm InWara claimed that only 30% of IEOs launched this year had what it calls a “minimum viable product” at the sale with most offering simply a website and a white paper.

A recent InWara research report into IEOs found that many exchanges don’t screen new products launched on their platforms, often offering subjective evaluation:

“That’s the problem here: there is no standardized vetting process… And as long as exchanges have the freedom to decide where to draw the line, bad actors, and fraud crypto projects will always creep into the limelight.”

 

BitcoinNews is committed to unbiased news and upholding journalistic codes of ethics. For more information please read our Editorial Policy here.

Follow BitcoinNews on Twitter: @bitcoinnewscom

Telegram Alerts from BitcoinNews: https://t.me/bconews

Image Courtesy: Unsplash

Help spread this article :)

BitcoinNews.com is NOT INVESTMENT ADVICE

Opinions expressed are entirely their own and do not necessarily reflect those of BitcoinNews.com

For informational purposes only. Individuals and entities should not construe any information on this site as investment, financial, legal, tax, accounting or other advice. Information provided does not constitute a recommendation or endorsement by BitcoinNews.com to buy or sell bitcoin, cryptocurrencies or other financial instruments. Forecasts are inherently limited and cannot be relied upon. Do your own research and consult a professional advisor. The opinion of authors do not reflect those of BitcoinNews.com 

   Advertisement

Read More Bitcoin News

Tragedy-of-Fiat-Money

The Tragedy of Fiat Money

Over the course of the last 18 years, the European Central Bank (ECB) printed new currency, multiplying money supply by more than 5 times, bringing it to 1308 billion. Here we discuss whether or not the central bank’s actions could be considered a robbery.

Read More »

   Advertisement

Join our Newsletter

Video of the Week

   Advertisement

Latest on Bitcoin News

Join our Newsletter

   Advertisement